Download the complete  notice of the proposed rule amendment to the regulated plants list.

If you have any questions or comments please contact Cort Jensen at (406)444-3144 or by email at agr@mt.gov.  The comment period ends August 12, 2010.

The proposed NPDES permit (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) was proposed because of a sixth court ruling where the EPA lost lawsuits in every circuit concerning the clean water act and pesticides. Previously, EPS’s 2006 rule stated that NPDES permits were not required for applications of pesticides when in compliance with FIFRA labels. Now all weed managers will be required to file for a permit when spraying over or near U.S. waters and that includes irrigation ditches and ponds; any body of water that can flow into waters of the U.S.

This permit is filled with unrealistic expectations in light of the fact pesticide application is weather dependent, duplicating existing efforts, and huge potential cost impacts. Just a couple of highlights from yesterday’s listening session:

• It was suggested by EPA that the best way to file a permit would be online, however, Montana will not be set up to complete this function, so the time frame to not only receive permission to treat would be lengthy (and you are not permitted to apply if near or over water if you do not have your permit/management plan in place) and the Montana office may not fully understand how many weed managers will need to file a permit in Montana. This permit is to take effect in April of 2011.
• You have ten days to complete application after approval.
• There will be a fee attached to each and every permit.
• The authors of this permit are currently trying to determine if a permit will apply a single body of water, or if a permit will be applied to an area (such as a watershed or a county). MWCA and MDA will be pushing for a possible state-wide permit.
• Montana Dept of Ag already has scientific-based data based on their monitoring of waters in the state (no other state does) and the incidents of high levels of pesticides in the water are minimal or non-existent; meaning we already have responsible applicators in Montana who do adhere to the label. Applicators who already adhere to FIFRA labels, will have to duplicate efforts to comply with the federal law.
• Citizens will be able to sue anyone who applies herbicide over or near water with this new permit and the fines could reach $37,500 per day if an applicator is found in violation of the clean water act.
• Montana DEQ personnel stated yesterday that if a weed truck rolls into a river on the way to a meeting (not in their county) they are in violation of the clean water act and can be fined, unless they have a permit in that area.  They were not able to answer the question “Will this scenario will mean all applicators will have to have a permit for their traveling area or entire state?”

It is imperative that you send in your comments and concerns to the EPA by July 19^th (next Monday) for public comment. Save your comments, because Montana DEQ will also be asking for public comment in the near future. There will be parties who will certainly be working  to get this legislation passed as drafted, but weed managers need to provide enough comment and information to change  the criteria outlined in this permit so that if passed that it contains regulation that is realistic when Mother Nature is one of the elements of use of pesticides and the paperwork and costs are not prohibitive. You can simply write up your concerns and comments in a Word document and email those comments to
ow-docket@epa.gov.  You can click here for the fact sheet or here for the FAQ.

Your contacts for more answers or information would be David Rise with Montana EPA Region 8 at Rise.David@epamail.epa.gov or Jenny Chambers, Bureau Chief of Water Protection Bureau, DEQ at jchambers@mt.gov

Becky Kington
MWCA Executive Director

Additional NPDES related information links:

Comment Guidelines document  by Jim Skillen, Director of Science & Regulatory Affairs for RISE and Carlton Layne, Executive Director for the Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation that is targeted at small businesses and applicators of aquatic pesticides.

Comments statement submitted by the Weed Science Society of America and its affiliate societies.

Click to view this webcast now.

If you have any questions or comments please contact Dave Burch  at 444-3140 or dburch@mt.gov.2010-

Council members asked several questions, but given their work load and the fact that they felt the group had already identified areas of revision, they asked Dave Burch with MT Dept of Ag to create a work group to begin addressing the changes in the act. They felt possible legislation could be ready for the next session and then, if a legislative review was warranted, they would consider it.

Dave Burch and MDA will be working to solicit individuals to sit in on this work group based on the criteria in a study bill, which is as follows:

• four members, two from each political party and two from each house, who are legislators appointed to the education and local government interim committee;
• two county commissioners;
• two county weed coordinators;
• the director of the department of agriculture or their designee;
• the director of the department of natural resources or their designee;
• the director of the department of fish, wildlife & parks or their designee; and
• one federal agency representative; and
• one city commissioner, town council member or city or town manager; and
• two county weed board members;
• one county attorney association representative

For more information on the progress and status of this group, please contact Dave Burch at dburch@mt.gov or 444 – 3140 .

Learn more about the “County Weed Act”

Why the importance for weed seed free forage? An excerpt from the law states the reason: “the movement of agricultural crops or commodities as livestock forage, bedding, mulch, and related materials, including pellets, cubes, and other processed livestock feeds with noxious weed seeds, causes new and expanding noxious weed infestations on private and government‑managed lands, which adversely impact agricultural, forest, recreational, and other lands.”

Find out more about Weed Seed Free Forage

Administrative Rules of Montana, Chapter 5 Subchapter 3 – Revised June 2006

Contents:

• Purpose and Scope
• Definition of Terms
• Noxious Weeds
• Application for Montana Certification of Noxious Weed Seed Free Forage
• Standard Range of Tolerances for Noxious Weed Seeds
• Procedures for Montana Certification of Forage Products
• Fogage inspection Procedures
• Forage Identification and Transportation
• Certification of Agents
• Stop Sale, Use or Removal Order
• Notification Requirements-County Embargo
• Collection of Fees
• Fees
• Contracts
• Identification of Product and Package Types
• Civil Penalties

Salt Cedar & Russian Olive Control & Demonstration Act – January 2006